why does LEED-CS EAc1 documentation have to be so @#%^$ confusing?!

2 posts / 0 new
Last post

I've asked this question before, but never really got a good answer, so
I'm trying again in case anyone has new info.

Has anyone successfully submitted a LEED v3 Core and Shell Energy Model?

Under v2.0, there was a LEED-CS EAc1 calculator explained here:

https://www.usgbc.org/ShowFile.aspx?DocumentID=6926

Spreadsheet link:

http://www.usgbc.org/ShowFile.aspx?DocumentID=6927

It was a great way to subtract out energy loads that the Owner/Developer
did not have control over.

However, under the new v3 Green Building Reference guide (includes NC,
CS, etc), they appear to have gotten rid of the sliding Developer/Tenant
scale, and now award just a different quantity of points for CS vs NC.
It certainly looks that way, and the v3 online template couldn't
possibly be more confusing to me, so I can't really tell by looking at
that.

Is this true? If so, it's a shame, because if you have a Core and Shell
project where there is an Owner requirement to provide a mechanical
system capable of supporting 5 Watts / sq ft tenant plug loads, you can
no longer back out the plug loads as an energy consumer "not controlled
by the Owner/Developer". I could reduce the plug load density to help
shrink the numerator/denominator, but that's not really an accurate
thing to do in a C&S project, since the Developer HAS to provide cooling
for 5 W / sq ft because of things like SFOs, specific tenant
requirements, etc. C&S projects are a completely different animal than
an NC project where you already know and can guarantee tenant loads.

That sucks. Can anyone confirm?

James Hansen, PE, LEED AP

James Hansen's picture
Offline
Joined: 2011-09-30
Reputation: 200