90.1 - Exterior lighting parking

3 posts / 0 new
Last post

Hello,

In a project for a 24h retail, the exterior lighting need to comply to ASHRAE 90.1 2010 (zone 3). I'm focusing on table 9.4.3-B:

? In tradable surfaces, there is "Uncovered Parking areas/Parking areas and drive = 1.1 W/m2"

? In non-tradable surfaces, there is "Parking near 24-hour retail entrances = 800 W per Main entry"
My project has a main entry just next a 2000 m2 parking.

Does anyone know if I can add the 800 W to the 2200 W allowed for the parking (2000 m2 x 1.1 W/m2)?

Many thanks
Julien

Julien Dutel, ing., CEM, CMVP.
Direction des secteurs r?sidentiel, institutionnel et des affaires
Bureau de l'efficacit? et de l'innovation ?nerg?tiques
Minist?re des Ressources naturelles
5700, 4e Avenue Ouest, B-406
Qu?bec (Qu?bec) G1H 6R1
T?l?phone : 418 627-6379, poste 8060
T?l?phone sans frais : 1 877 727-6655
T?l?copieur : 418 643-5828
http://www.efficaciteenergetique.mrn.gouv.qc.ca
AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALIT?
Ce message est confidentiel. Il est ? l'usage exclusif du destinataire ci-dessus. Si vous n'?tes pas le destinataire vis? ou une personne autoris?e ? lui remettre cette communication, vous ?tes par la pr?sente avis? qu'il est express?ment interdit de le diffuser, de le distribuer, de le reproduire, d'en d?voiler la teneur ou de prendre quelque mesure fond?e sur l'information qui y est contenue. S'il vous a ?t? envoy? par erreur, veuillez en informer imm?diatement l'exp?diteur par t?l?phone au 418 627-6379 et d?truire ce message ainsi que toute copie de celui-ci.
P Devez-vous vraiment imprimer ce courriel? Si oui, pensez l'imprimer recto-verso!

Julien.Dutel at mern.gouv.qc.ca's picture
Joined: 2015-06-05
Reputation: 0

My interpretation is that yes, you can add it, but in most cases you
probably don't want to. I would only dip into the non-tradable if you
can't stay under your standard tradable parking allowance, since it would
only hurt your savings otherwise. (Non-tradable must be modeled
identically in baseline/proposed.)

Cheers,
Elizabeth

*Elizabeth Gillmor PE, LC, LEED AP*

*e n e r g e t i c s **consulting engineers, llc*
energetics-eng.com
c 303.619.0091

2015-08-06 14:57 GMT-06:00 :

Anonymous's picture
Anonymous

To build on Elizabeth?s response:

If the fixtures illuminating what could be classified as ?nontradable?
parking are also illuminating tradable surfaces (i.e. uncovered parking),
it is to your advantage for a LEED model to treat all parking areas as
uncovered. GBCI would have you match wattage for those areas between
baseline/proposed cases, and you can?t ?double-count? the area between
surface types. The net result is that associated installed power is a
?dead load? on your relative savings potential.

If you are documenting installed lighting power to simply demonstrate
compliance with 90.1-2010 however (outside of a LEED project), such
non-tradable distinctions will generally help your case. I like to avoid
more work than necessary however, and for a large exterior takeoff will
usually run the numbers first without carving out nontradable surface
distinctions. In my experience: unless you have a lot of fa?ade lighting
to account for, compliance can often be demonstrated with only tradable
surface allowances, and you can then just call it a day and move on to the
next thing.

Best of luck!

~Nick

*NICK CATON, P.E.*
*Owner*

*Caton Energy Consulting*
306 N Ferrel

Olathe, KS 66061

office: 785.410.3317

www.catonenergy.com

*From:* Bldg-sim [mailto:bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] *On Behalf
Of *Elizabeth Gillmor
*Sent:* Thursday, August 06, 2015 4:10 PM
*To:* Julien.Dutel at mern.gouv.qc.ca
*Cc:* bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org
*Subject:* Re: [Bldg-sim] 90.1 - Exterior lighting parking

My interpretation is that yes, you can add it, but in most cases you
probably don't want to. I would only dip into the non-tradable if you
can't stay under your standard tradable parking allowance, since it would
only hurt your savings otherwise. (Non-tradable must be modeled
identically in baseline/proposed.)

Cheers,

Elizabeth

*Elizabeth Gillmor **PE, LC, LEED AP*

*e n e r g e t i c s **consulting engineers, llc*

energetics-eng.com

c 303.619.0091

2015-08-06 14:57 GMT-06:00 :

Hello,

In a project for a 24h retail, the exterior lighting need to comply to
ASHRAE 90.1 2010 (zone 3). I?m focusing on table 9.4.3-B:

? In tradable surfaces, there is ?Uncovered Parking areas/Parking
areas and drive = 1.1 W/m2?

? In non-tradable surfaces, there is ?Parking near 24-hour retail
entrances = 800 W per Main entry?

My project has a main entry just next a 2000 m2 parking.

Does anyone know if I can add the 800 W to the 2200 W allowed for the
parking (2000 m2 x 1.1 W/m2)?

Many thanks

Julien

*Julien Dutel,* ing., CEM, CMVP*.*

Direction des secteurs r?sidentiel, institutionnel et des affaires

Bureau de l'efficacit? et de l'innovation ?nerg?tiques

Minist?re des Ressources naturelles

5700, 4e Avenue Ouest, B-406

Qu?bec (Qu?bec) G1H 6R1

T?l?phone : 418 627-6379, poste 8060

T?l?phone sans frais : 1 877 727-6655

T?l?copieur : 418 643-5828

http://www.efficaciteenergetique.mrn.gouv.qc.ca

*AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALIT?*

*Ce message est confidentiel. Il est ? l'usage exclusif du destinataire
ci-dessus. Si vous n'?tes pas le destinataire vis? ou une personne
autoris?e ? lui remettre cette communication, vous ?tes par la pr?sente
avis? qu'il est express?ment interdit* *de le diffuser, de le distribuer,
de le reproduire,* *d'en d?voiler la teneur ou de prendre quelque mesure
fond?e sur l'information qui y est contenue. S?il vous a ?t? envoy? par
erreur, veuillez en informer imm?diatement l'exp?diteur par t?l?phone au
418 627-6379 <418%20627-6379> et d?truire ce message ainsi que toute copie
de celui-ci.*

*P* Devez-vous vraiment imprimer ce courriel? Si oui, pensez l?imprimer
recto-verso!

_______________________________________________
Bldg-sim mailing list
http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list send a blank message to
BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG

Nicholas Caton's picture
Offline
Joined: 2014-12-09
Reputation: 0