Over the past few years, I've noticed a shift in the questions building owners are asking.
Ten years ago, many projects were focused on reducing utility bills.
A few years ago, much of the discussion centered around incentives such as 179D, utility rebates, and LEED certification.
Today, more owners are asking about carbon emissions, electrification, net zero buildings, and long-term decarbonization plans.
That often leads to a term that sounds more complicated than it really is:
Building Decarbonization Roadmap.
So what is a decarbonization roadmap, and does it require an energy model?
A building decarbonization roadmap is simply a plan for reducing greenhouse gas emissions over time.
In most cases, the roadmap identifies:
Think of it as a long-term plan rather than a single project.
A building owner may not replace every system at once. Instead, they may plan improvements over 5, 10, or even 20 years as equipment reaches the end of its useful life.
For most commercial buildings, emissions generally come from:
The largest contributors often include:
The exact breakdown depends heavily on the building type, operating schedule, and climate.
A hospital, office building, school, and data center can have very different emission profiles even if they are the same size.
Many roadmaps include some combination of the following strategies.
Reducing lighting power often provides immediate savings while also reducing cooling loads.
Variable speed drives, improved controls, heat recovery, and higher-efficiency equipment can significantly reduce energy use.
Many organizations are evaluating electric heat pumps as an alternative to fossil-fuel heating systems.
Solar PV is commonly evaluated to offset a portion of annual electricity consumption.
Insulation, glazing improvements, and air sealing can reduce heating and cooling requirements.
One of the biggest misconceptions is that utility bills can identify the best path forward.
Utility bills tell us what happened.
They do not tell us what will happen if we change the building.
For example:
Utility bills cannot answer those questions.
This is where energy modeling becomes useful.
Not every decarbonization study requires a detailed energy model.
For relatively simple projects, benchmarking and utility analysis may provide enough information.
However, an energy model becomes increasingly valuable when:
An energy model allows the team to test multiple scenarios before spending money in the field.
In many cases, the model helps identify which measures provide the greatest reduction in energy use, operating cost, or carbon emissions.
Suppose a building owner wants to reduce emissions by 40%.
Several options might be considered:
The challenge is that these measures interact with each other.
Reducing lighting power reduces cooling loads.
Improving ventilation control affects heating and cooling energy.
Solar production changes the building's net electrical consumption.
An energy model allows these interactions to be evaluated together rather than estimating each measure independently.
One mistake I occasionally see is focusing exclusively on carbon reduction.
Most building owners are trying to balance several objectives:
A good decarbonization roadmap considers all of these factors.
A building decarbonization roadmap is simply a plan for reducing emissions in a practical and cost-effective way.
For some buildings, utility analysis may be sufficient to identify opportunities.
For larger projects, electrification studies, or major capital investments, an energy model can provide valuable insight into how different measures interact before money is spent.
As carbon reporting requirements, electrification initiatives, and sustainability goals continue to evolve, I expect more owners to evaluate decarbonization strategies over the coming years.
The question is no longer whether improvements are possible.
The real question is which improvements provide the greatest benefit for the investment.
Every building is different, and the best path forward depends on factors such as climate, utility rates, building type, operating schedule, and existing equipment.
If you're considering a decarbonization study, electrification project, carbon reduction plan, or simply want to understand where your building's emissions are coming from, we'd be happy to discuss your project.
Click the Contact Us icon in the lower-right corner of this page and tell us a little about your building. I'll review the information and let you know whether a utility analysis, energy model, or more detailed study makes sense for your situation.
Energy-Models.com is a site for energy modelers, building simulators, architects, and engineers who want learn the basics, to advanced concepts of energy modeling. We've got online training courses and tutorials for eQUEST, Trane TRACE 700, OpenStudio, and LEED for energy modeling. All our energy modeling courses are video based. What better way to learn energy modeling software than screen-casts of exactly how things are done?
Copyright © 2010-2024 CosmoLogic LLC. TRACE 700 and eQUEST are ™ of Trane Inc. and James J. Hirsch respectively. Energy-Models.com is built in San Francisco, CA and Slinger, WI USA.