When it comes to Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs), many projects follow a path of predictable chaos—chasing rebates, installing trendy technology, or layering multiple strategies based on buzzwords or assumptions. Unfortunately, that approach often leads to diminishing returns, budget overruns, and missed opportunities.
We take a different approach—one grounded in data, context, and natural forces.
Over the years, we’ve developed a proprietary framework for identifying ECMs that deliver measurable ROI, tailored to each building’s actual profile, environment, and utility conditions. This method allows us to prioritize impactful upgrades and avoid wasting capital on redundant or low-impact strategies.
We start by breaking down the building into its primary energy-consuming systems, such as:
From there, we quantify energy consumption for each category and plot it as an energy pie chart. This visual reveals the biggest energy consumers and helps us focus ECM efforts where they’ll have the most impact.
Instead of fighting nature, we work with it. This means analyzing how the building interacts with its surroundings—and identifying opportunities for passive or hybrid solutions.
We consider:
Optimizing these elements reduces the need for mechanical intervention—lowering operating costs before any high-tech ECM is even introduced.
We prioritize ECMs based on each component’s share of total energy use. For example, if 40% of energy use is driven by cooling, we focus first on strategies that reduce cooling loads and operating hours.
But ECMs don’t act in isolation—they’re interdependent. Consider this:
Reducing lighting power density not only cuts lighting energy—it also lowers internal heat gain, which:
That increased heating can be addressed by optimizing window orientation to allow more passive solar gain—thus maintaining a balanced load profile with greater total efficiency.
This kind of systems thinking is what ensures ECMs work together, not against each other.
Energy savings alone don’t tell the full story. Utility rate structures—especially those with demand charges and time-of-use pricing—can significantly affect ECM value.
We evaluate each measure based on:
By aligning ECMs with actual utility billing practices, we help our clients maximize cost savings—not just energy savings.
No ECM is effective unless it can be installed and maintained reliably. That’s why we evaluate local capabilities before making final recommendations.
This ensures real-world performance matches projected performance—and avoids ECMs becoming expensive burdens down the road.
We recently supported a mid-size office building retrofit in Louisville, KY, a city with hot-humid summers, cold winters, and high daytime demand charges. The client was facing rising energy bills and poor HVAC performance.
Key ECMs implemented:
Results:
By taking a holistic approach, we achieved cost savings significantly higher than energy savings—a result that’s only possible when ECMs are selected and integrated with full system awareness.
If you're planning a renovation, pursuing incentives, or designing a new building, we can help you find the most valuable ECMs—strategically, not randomly.
Contact us for a custom analysis or see if your project qualifies for a free strategy consultation. Let’s work with the building—and with nature—to maximize your return.
Bob Fassbender graduated from the University of Wisconsin - Madison with a degree in Chemical-Engineering. Following graduation, he spent 3 years working as a Marketing Engineer for Trane C.D.S. In the C.D.S. group, Bob developed and supported design and analysis software, primarily TRACE 700™. In addition to his development work, Bob also traveled around the country as a TRACE 700™ and System Analyzer™ instructor. Bob is also an experienced user with eQUEST energy modeling software. Today, Bob continues training and energy modeling as a LEED accredited professional (with a focus on LEED EA credit 1).
Energy-Models.com is a site for energy modelers, building simulators, architects, and engineers who want learn the basics, to advanced concepts of energy modeling. We've got online training courses and tutorials for eQUEST, Trane TRACE 700, OpenStudio, and LEED for energy modeling. All our energy modeling courses are video based. What better way to learn energy modeling software than screen-casts of exactly how things are done?
Copyright © 2010-2024 CosmoLogic LLC. TRACE 700 and eQUEST are ™ of Trane Inc. and James J. Hirsch respectively. Energy-Models.com is built in San Francisco, CA and Slinger, WI USA.