DesignBuilder

5 posts / 0 new
Last post

Does anyone have experience with both Trane Trace and DesignBuilder?

I am researching the advantages my firm will gain from DesignBuilder. The 3D, Revit compatibility, Daylighting, Optimization and CFD are very appealing and I can see how these would allow us to help client's in new ways. DesignBuilder seems to be relatively new as a full-fledged EnergyPlus interface. I am having trouble finding 3rd party reviews or comparisons of this software. Really just having trouble finding anything bad about it at all except for bloggers complaining about it not being as user friendly as they thought(I can't imagine it being any worse than Trace). I am also skeptical about its ability to transfer geometry from Revit - Especially since generally our Revit models are not full BIM models.

A little background:
I work for a full service A&E firm. We are primarily a "production" firm and work with a lot of Commercial - Retail building. We are looking to expand what we do with our energy services. We currently run all of our HVAC loads, LEED and Code compliance models with Trane Trace. We use Revit for almost all of our projects.

Thanks everyone!

Shane Wells
Mechanical Intern II

t 479.273.7780 ext 320
f 888.520.9685

shane.wells at hfa-ae.com
www.hfa-ae.com

[cid:image001.jpg at 01CFEF62.4ABC1F70]

1705 S. Walton Blvd Suite 3 Bentonville, Arkansas 72712

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which
is addressed and may contain confidential and / or priviledged material.
Use, disclosure, distribution, or reproduction of this message by unintended
recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful. If you received this in
error, please contact the sender and destroy any copies of this document.

shane wells
srw3987's picture
Offline
Joined: 2014-08-28
Reputation: 0

My experience is that Design builder is much more intuitive than TRACE, and
that GBXML is possible with design builder so long as you enclose your
zones. Since your firm is a Revit user, you have a real advantage with
Design Builder over Trace if you use their Revit plugin. Design Builder
recently added a lot of ASHRAE 90.1 templates etc so your LEED projects
will be easier.

*??Jeremiah D. Crossett ** | Senior Analyst **| **LEED Green Associate *
*??7411 SW Capitol Highway | Portland, OR 97219 ?? |
Mobile 503-688-8951www.phasechange.com *

Jeremiah Crossett2's picture
Joined: 2012-12-14
Reputation: 0

Thanks for your input Jeremiah!

Shane Wells
Mechanical Intern II

t 479.273.7780 ext 320
f 888.520.9685

shane.wells at hfa-ae.com
www.hfa-ae.com

[cid:image001.jpg at 01CFEF91.FEA44AB0]

1705 S. Walton Blvd Suite 3 Bentonville, Arkansas 72712

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which
is addressed and may contain confidential and / or priviledged material.
Use, disclosure, distribution, or reproduction of this message by unintended
recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful. If you received this in
error, please contact the sender and destroy any copies of this document.

shane wells
srw3987's picture
Offline
Joined: 2014-08-28
Reputation: 0

Hi Shane,

We use DesignBuilder for our energy models, and find it quite user
friendly. Although I may just be used to it.

In regards to Revit importing, we don?t do it based on the advice of the
support guys, as the general feeling at the moment is that its more effort
to clean up a Revit model than to just build a new simplified one for the
energy model.

The CFD capability is quite new, and in my opinion still very basic. For
anything beyond simple analysis I would look at other, CFD specific
software. The meshing tools and boundary condition options are quite
limited.

And again for optimization, after having a play with it we determined it
didn?t provide us the value for the cost. But that would again depend on
the user.

The HVAC is good, but like many software options doesn?t utilise the ePlus
capability to do VRV. This is a bit of a limitation.

In terms of energy models however we still use it and rate it quite well.
Relatively simple to change things, setup templates for quick model setup
etc.

All in all definitely worth downloading the trial and spending some time on
it to see if you like it.

Cheers,

Mike

[image: Description: Description: Description:
http://www.northrop.com.au/logo_email.gif]

*Michael Smith*
Building Simulation Engineer
*Northrop Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd*
T: 02 6285 1822
M: 0450 140 132

www.northrop.com.au

*Northrop Sustainability, providing Sustainability Advice across the Built
Environment ? Buildings, Infrastructure, Precincts and Policy*

*Please note that I will be on leave from Monday 22rd September until
Monday 27th October.*

[image: cid:image002.png at 01CFAFC3.A4615740]

*From:* Bldg-sim [mailto:bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] *On Behalf
Of *Shane Wells
*Sent:* Saturday, 25 October 2014 12:42 AM
*To:* bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org
*Subject:* [Bldg-sim] DesignBuilder

Does anyone have experience with both Trane Trace and DesignBuilder?

I am researching the advantages my firm will gain from DesignBuilder. The
3D, Revit compatibility, Daylighting, Optimization and CFD are very
appealing and I can see how these would allow us to help client?s in new
ways. DesignBuilder seems to be relatively new as a full-fledged EnergyPlus
interface. I am having trouble finding 3rd party reviews or comparisons of
this software. Really just having trouble finding anything bad about it at
all except for bloggers complaining about it not being as user friendly as
they thought(I can?t imagine it being any worse than Trace). I am also
skeptical about its ability to transfer geometry from Revit - Especially
since generally our Revit models are not full BIM models.

A little background:

I work for a full service A&E firm. We are primarily a ?production? firm
and work with a lot of Commercial ? Retail building. We are looking to
expand what we do with our energy services. We currently run all of our
HVAC loads, LEED and Code compliance models with Trane Trace. We use Revit
for almost all of our projects.

Thanks everyone!

*Shane Wells *

*Mechanical Intern II*

t 479.273.7780 ext 320

f 888.520.9685

shane.wells at hfa-ae.com

www.hfa-ae.com

1705 S. Walton Blvd Suite 3 Bentonville, Arkansas 72712

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which

is addressed and may contain confidential and / or priviledged
material.

Use, disclosure, distribution, or reproduction of this message by
unintended

recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful. If you received
this in

error, please contact the sender and destroy any copies of this
document.

Michael Smith's picture
Offline
Joined: 2014-06-17
Reputation: 0

I've used DesignBuilder for a few years, with a bit of experience with
Trace. I have a mixed experience with DB, difficult to recommend outright,
but worth a trial.

When DesignBuilder works, it works great. However there are many instances
where it is unclear how to model something or interpret results. It's much
more complex, and the effort in learning how to overcome a problem will
typically occur exactly when I have a deadline. The

Maybe this is due to the newer version, but on the plus side the gbXML
import for geometry went smoothly for me. I just finished a project last
week where I drew geometry in Revit, added spaces and zones, client
reviewed internal gains on my A0 printouts, and imported geometry into DB.
The zone and construction parameters didn't transfer, so this was done in
DB templates by naming the zones in Revit with their space types. The
internal DB geometry editor is also nice, but it can be cumbersome for
complex buildings, especially if you need to change zoning later. So if you
have experience in Revit I would recommend gbXML route instead.

I used DB to analyze the effects of automatically controlled shading, and
was optimizing the angle of external blind slats and reporting results on
an hourly basis, very detailed with nice results. However for the final
cooling loads I still used Trace! (Trace also imports gbXML)

And I concur with Mike - please leave the CFD to CFD experts.

[image: Inline image 2]

[image: Inline image 1]

Cheers,

Marcus
--
Marcus Jones, M.Sc., LEED?AP BD+C
*Freelance energy consultant*
*Vienna, Austria*

Marcus's picture
Offline
Joined: 2011-10-02
Reputation: 0