Hi there,

Just a philosophical one; maybe even an existential one ?

Given LLMs? ?autocorrect on steroids? abilities, what risk do we see ourselves exposed to as modelling professionals?

Let?s give an example?

* A full LEED application including reports, unmet load tables, ?error? reports.
* Not based on modelling ? all reports and outputs generated with LLMs.

I think it would be relatively easy to do this, and present something that would stand up to review.

I think this poses the following questions:

1. If our main value offering can be replaced with auto-complete, what is the value of what we?re doing, anyway?
2. How can we improve the value?
3. How can we protect that value?

I?d like to propose some solutions:

* Tie Design stage models into the Operation of the building ? calibrate
* Rather than just submitting reports, place model input files into escrow with GBCI (or their local equivalent)

Controversial?

Cheers

Chris