TRANSFER FUNCTION FOR HEAVY AND THICK WALLS

5 posts / 0 new
Last post

Dear colleagues,

As you probably know, Conduction Transfer Function (CTF) method does not handle thick and massive walls, because the accuracy of the CTF coefficients is degraded. In particular, in DOE-2, you get the following message:

"Cannot simulate LAYERS .... as given. The wall is too thick or too dense"

I have heard of a possible solution to solve this problem by dividing the wall into thin layers. I have made an attempt in e-quest, but the problem remains, and I do not know how to proceed.

Any insight on this issue would be appreciated.

Sincerely,

LPL

-------------------------------------------------------------
Luis P?rez-Lombard
Dr. Ingeniero Industrial
Profesor Contratado Doctor
Departamento de Ingenier?a Energ?tica
Escuela Superior de Ingenieros
Universidad de Sevilla
Camino de los Descubrimientos s/n
41092 SEVILLA
Tfno.: 95.448.72.56
Fax: 95.446.31.53
e-mail: lpl at us.es
-------------------------------------------------------------

lpl's picture
lpl
Offline
Joined: 2011-10-01
Reputation: 0

Luis

You may explore E+ different ways of dealing with CTF (state space method
mainly). CTF calculations become unstable for short time steps and massive
constructions (it is at the end a computational problem). E-Quest may
decide on your arrangement to be unstable before running the simulation
(not sure of this). There are solutions to solve this problem (Seem 1987),
and I guess these have been incorporated into CTF calculation within E+. It
is a matter of giving E+ a go and try out if your example may work there.

E+ also handles Finite Differences Methods for CTF calculations, but I am
not versed in this field.

You can find more information in the E+ Engineering Reference Manual.

Regards
Abrazos desde Hibernia
Luis

2014-05-16 14:06 GMT+01:00 Luis Per?z-Lombard :

--
LUIS M BLANES RESTOY

*IRUSE *INFORMATICS RESEARCH UNIT FOR SUSTAINABLE ENGINEERING
www.iruse.ie
mobile Ireland: +353 83 1346875
mobile Spain: +34 609097818
skype: lmblanes
email: lmblanes at gmail.com

Luis Miguel Blanes Restoy's picture
Joined: 2012-06-07
Reputation: 0

Can you use Energy Plus? It has a conduction finite difference option that
might avoid the computational problem that the CTF method has.

Regards,
Danielle Bond

Danielle E.M. Bond's picture
Joined: 2014-05-23
Reputation: 0

Luis,

I'm not sure if I have an answer for your problem, but I want to point out some technical
details that may be being overlooked.

1. DOE-2 does not use CTFs, it uses Response Factors, which shares the same approach as
CTFs but uses a different formulation.

2. When DOE-2 says it cannot simulate a layer because it's too thick, that's not because
the RF methodology fails but because DOE-2 has a maximum of 100 time-steps, i.e., 100
hours, for the three response factors (X,Y,Z) to converge to constant COMMON RATIOs that
are used to compute the residual responses from that point on.

3. There are two situations that could cause such convergence problems - (a) the layer is
simply too massive. I know from trial and error that the thickest single-layer of dirt
allowed in DOE-2 is 5.25 ft (1.6 meters), (b) this thickness will be greatly reduced if
there are multiple layers with contrasting thermal properties; again, from
trial-and-error, if there is a layer of insulation below the dirt, the maximum allowable
thickness of the dirt layer will be reduced by half or more. You've mentioned that
someone has mentioned creating multiple thin layers. This will do help with (a), but could
help with (b), provided that the thin layers are graduated in their thermal properties;
I've never tried this so I can't tell how much benefit would there be, but my guess is not
very much.

3. I don't know EnergyPlus well enough to say whether it has a similar hard limit on
convergence and if so, what is it. If not, you might be able to model the same layer in
EnergyPlus and not encounter any difficulties.

4. If all else fails, as others have already mentioned, you can do an explicit solution
using the Finite Difference Method in EnergyPlus, but expect that to slow down your
simulations considerably.

Joe

Joe Huang
White Box Technologies, Inc.
346 Rheem Blvd., Suite 108D
Moraga CA 94556
yjhuang at whiteboxtechnologies.com
http://weather.whiteboxtechnologies.com for simulation-ready weather data
(o) (925)388-0265
(c) (510)928-2683
"building energy simulations at your fingertips"

Joe Huang's picture
Offline
Joined: 2011-09-30
Reputation: 406

Correction to typo below.

Joe

Joe Huang
White Box Technologies, Inc.
346 Rheem Blvd., Suite 108D
Moraga CA 94556
yjhuang at whiteboxtechnologies.com
http://weather.whiteboxtechnologies.com for simulation-ready weather data
(o) (925)388-0265
(c) (510)928-2683
"building energy simulations at your fingertips"

Joe Huang's picture
Offline
Joined: 2011-09-30
Reputation: 406