NECB 2015 Question

6 posts / 0 new
Last post

Good morning,

This is a question for my follow Canadians that have experience with the
NECB 2015 code.

What is everyone's take on what fenestration area to model for the
reference model when the Proposed model area is less than the maximum
permitted?

Specifically, I'm referring to Part 8.4.4.3.3) which states "If the total
vertical fenestration and door area to gross wall area (FDWR) of the
proposed building differs from the maximum permitted by Article 3.2.1.1.,
the FDWR of the reference building shall be adjusted proportionally along
each orientation until it complies with that Article."

Do people interpret this as if my Proposed FDWR is say 20%, then my
Reference FDWR is to be increased to say 40% (based on a Zone 5 climate)?

Thanks,
Chris

Chris Hadlock's picture
Offline
Joined: 2012-01-23
Reputation: 0

That's my interpretation, although I know of at least one local code
(Ontario's SB-10) that has modified this:

[image: image.png]

On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 9:46 AM Chris Hadlock via Equest-users <

--
Kind Regards,

*KYLE ANDERS*, MASc, NRCan EA, LEED for Homes Green Rater

*Senior Project Manager*

*T* | 1-800-267-6830 x180 *C* | 226-220-2391
*F* | 519-658-6103 *E* | kyle at buildingknowledge.ca

*This communication is intended for the sole use of the person(s) to whom
it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential or subject to copyright. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately. Any
communication received in error should be deleted and all copies destroyed.*

Kyle Anders's picture
Offline
Joined: 2019-03-25
Reputation: 0

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:

bfountain's picture
Offline
Joined: 2011-09-30
Reputation: 201

Good morning,

That would be my interpretation too. It differs if it is more or less than
the maximum permitted and should be adjusted for the reference as maximum
permitted.This approach is different than with ASHRAE 90.1 and gives a
significant advantage to projects with less windows than usual (which is a
good thing). Same approach is taken with Energuide ratings : HOT2000
software adjust the ratio of reference building as soon as the proposed
building is outside the minimum and maximum ranges : 17% - 22%.

This interpretation would also be confirmed by the LEED V4 Canadian ACP (
https://www.cagbc.org/cagbcdocs/leed/LEED_v4_Canadian_ACP_Language_as_of_20170420.pdf)
that states that projects can use the NECB reference at some conditions,
including :

*Apply fenestration area convention similar to ASHRAE 90.1-2010 *
Maintain the same FWR (as defined by NECB, including doors) for the
Reference as exists in the Proposed Design, up to the prescribed maximum.
If the Proposed Design?s FWR exceeds the prescribed FWR, scale down the
fenestrations in the Reference case accordingly.

However, NECB is quite unclear on this topic and it could be good to have
an official guidance :)

Benjamin Zizi
Coordonnateur technique

?valuateur ?cologique et ?nerg?tique LEED Habitations

?valuations ?cohabitation
6001, rue St-Hubert | Montr?al QC | H2S 2L8
514.985.0004 poste 613 | 1 855.400.0326

ecohabitation.com

Suivez-nous !
facebook | twitter
| infolettre

Le jeu. 14 mars 2019 ? 09:58, Kyle Anders via Equest-users <
equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org> a ?crit :

Benjamin Zizi2's picture
Offline
Joined: 2019-03-25
Reputation: 0

Thanks you to all the respondents. I've had 3 consistent responses that in
fact the Reference window area is to be set to the maximum allowable in all
cases (for the NECB code), which I'll take as general (modeler's) agreement.

Cheers,
Chris

On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 10:47 AM Benjamin Zizi
wrote:

Chris Hadlock's picture
Offline
Joined: 2012-01-23
Reputation: 0

Hi Chris,

I agree as well, that?s how we?ve been interpreting it. Basically in Calgary climate zone 7A if the proposed design has a 20% FDWR then the reference building can be set to 33%. And there?s also an allowable skylight area (I think it?s 5% or less?) which can be applied to the reference building as well.

Cheers,
Menush Akbari BEng, PEng, BEMP, CMVP
Associate Principal, Energy
c 250 777 3380

[cid:image002.jpg at 01D4DA83.2B1BA530]

Calgary | Nelson
missiongreenbuildings.com
Member of Integral Group

Menush's picture
Offline
Joined: 2016-03-01
Reputation: 0