Hello Energy Modelers,
This is regarding to increased cooling consumption while modelling DCV in eQUEST.I have prepared a hourly analysis on a single zone modeled without and with DCV, hourly result is attached.
Modeling Inputs
1. Project Location : Bangalore India (moderate climate).
2. Occupancy profile : 90% in office hours and 50% in lunch hours
3. Minimum air schedule is modeled in air side and minimum control is set to DCV reset down.
The outcomes are summarize below:
=Without DCV-With DCV Remarks
Difference in supply air flow (btu) 2,98,886 Reduced
Difference in latent (btu) 0 No change
Difference in total tonnage (TR) -1,764 Increased
Difference in fresh air (CFM) 8,51,210 Reduced
Difference in vent fan consumption (kW) 32 Reduced
Queries :
1. Supply flow air and vent fan consumption is reduced, why their is an increment total cooling consumption.
2. Why their is no change in Total SPACE latent heat load from LOADS (Btu/hr).
3. What should be the correct way to model this and get efficiency.
Warm Regards
Harshal Gupta
Energy Analyst
LEED AP
[cid:96544101-c417-4e46-b22e-12b0ce86db48] [1504090917380_igbc-logo-big.jpg] [1504090994828_GROHA]
As I have noted before (http://lists.onebuilding.org/htdig.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org/2015-December/001790.html) in my experience, the best way to do DCV in eQUEST is to do a manual calculation of the expected reduction in OA rates by looking at the fan schedule and the occupancy schedule. Keep in mind that only the ?people? part of the OA rate will be reduced, whereas the ?area? part will stay the same.
If you?d like to know what your model is doing you may want try comparing the hourly outdoor air rates for your system with and without DCV. You can create an hourly report for the system in question with the hourly supply flow rate and outdoor air fraction printed to the hourly report file.
I know that the new version of DOE2.3 has made some changes to the outdoor air calculation methodology but I haven?t had a chance to test this yet.
All the best,
Daniel
From: Equest-users on behalf of Harshal Gupta via Equest-users
Reply-To: Harshal Gupta
Date: Friday, January 11, 2019 at 10:24 PM
To: "equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org"
Subject: [Equest-users] Increassed cooling consumption with DCV Modeling
Hello Energy Modelers,
This is regarding to increased cooling consumption while modelling DCV in eQUEST.I have prepared a hourly analysis on a single zone modeled without and with DCV, hourly result is attached.
Modeling Inputs
1. Project Location : Bangalore India (moderate climate).
2. Occupancy profile : 90% in office hours and 50% in lunch hours
3. Minimum air schedule is modeled in air side and minimum control is set to DCV reset down.
The outcomes are summarize below:
=Without DCV-With DCV
Remarks
Difference in supply air flow (btu)
2,98,886
Reduced
Difference in latent (btu)
0
No change
Difference in total tonnage (TR)
-1,764
Increased
Difference in fresh air (CFM)
8,51,210
Reduced
Difference in vent fan consumption (kW)
32
Reduced
Queries :
1. Supply flow air and vent fan consumption is reduced, why their is an increment total cooling consumption.
2. Why their is no change in Total SPACE latent heat load from LOADS (Btu/hr).
3. What should be the correct way to model this and get efficiency.
Warm Regards || IGBC AP || GRIHA CP
Harshal Gupta
Energy Analyst
LEED AP
[cid:96544101-c417-4e46-b22e-12b0ce86db48] [1504090917380_igbc-logo-big.jpg] [1504090994828_GROHA]