*proposed model Warning*:-1) ZONE E32 East Perim Zn (G.E16)
might have insufficient heating capability.
Check that the SYSTEM or ZONE HEATING-CAPACITY plus this
ZONEs BASEBOARD-RATING is adequate to maintain the ZONE
specified DESIGN-HEAT-T for the calculated peak ZONE load
(see LS-A or LS-B for the ZONE peak load.)

*baseline model Warning*:- 2) ZONE E13 ESE Perim Zn (G.ESE19)
might have insufficient heating capability.
Check that the SYSTEM or ZONE HEATING-CAPACITY plus this
ZONEs BASEBOARD-RATING is adequate to maintain the ZONE
specified DESIGN-HEAT-T for the calculated peak ZONE load
(see LS-A or LS-B for the ZONE peak load.)

SYSTEM Sixth FlrAC
which supplies the above listed ZONE, has a design heating
coil exit temperature, HEAT-SET-T,(plus any zone reheat)
below its MAX-SUPPLY-T or the ZONE DESIGN-HEAT-T, which
might account for the insufficient heating capability.

While both model showing overall 6000 unmate hours in *BEPS Building
Energy Performance* tab; whereas individual Zone doesnt show any unmate
hours in *SS-R zone performance summary*.
*can you guys help me out to resolve above issues..? *

*Vishal*